Coverage rankings for Hillsdale County, MI
AT&T currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 81.6. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AT&T | 81.6 | 98.0% | 98.0% | 75.7% | 60.0% | -114 dBm |
| 2 | Verizon | 79.0 | 99.7% | 99.7% | 56.6% | 38.9% | -96 dBm |
| 3 | T-Mobile | 57.0 | 62.3% | 62.3% | 44.9% | 27.8% | -95 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Hillsdale County, MI
AT&T
- Overall
- 98.0%
- 4G LTE
- 98.0%
- 5G
- 75.7%
- Fast 5G
- 60.0%
Verizon
- Overall
- 99.7%
- 4G LTE
- 99.7%
- 5G
- 56.6%
- Fast 5G
- 38.9%
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 62.3%
- 4G LTE
- 62.3%
- 5G
- 44.9%
- Fast 5G
- 27.8%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Hillsdale County, MI
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allen, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -73 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -77 dBm |
| Cambria, MI | 89.7% 86.2% 55.2% 44.8% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 58.6% 55.2% -119 dBm | 3.4% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Camden, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% 90.0% -79 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -107 dBm | 15.0% 15.0% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm |
| Hillsdale, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 74.6% 59.4% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.1% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% 84.1% -86 dBm |
| Jerome, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 56.6% 41.9% -93 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 85.8% 51.5% -113 dBm | 72.2% 72.2% 51.7% 28.9% -96 dBm |
| Jonesville, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 86.2% 66.2% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.8% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.4% -80 dBm |
| Lake LeAnn, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 59.0% 46.2% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 76.9% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 71.8% -89 dBm |
| Litchfield, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.9% -83 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 81.8% -100 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.0% -81 dBm |
| Montgomery, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -74 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -112 dBm | 4.3% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| North Adams, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 92.3% 84.6% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -98 dBm | 23.1% 23.1% 7.7% 0.0% -107 dBm |
| Osseo, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 50.2% 31.5% -99 dBm | 98.8% 98.8% 71.1% 61.6% -117 dBm | 67.9% 67.9% 42.5% 15.0% -101 dBm |
| Pittsford, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 88.6% 81.8% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -101 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -74 dBm |
| Reading, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 8.0% 0.0% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -96 dBm | 4.0% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Somerset Center, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 55.0% 31.7% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 86.7% -107 dBm | 98.3% 98.3% 91.7% 63.3% -90 dBm |
| Waldron, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 95.8% 37.5% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 79.2% -115 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 91.7% 62.5% -95 dBm |
| Hudson, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 98.1% 92.3% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 96.2% 94.2% -107 dBm | 96.2% 96.2% 32.7% 3.8% -104 dBm |