Coverage rankings for Clinton County, MI
Verizon currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 92.3. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verizon | 92.3 | 99.8% | 99.8% | 90.3% | 76.2% | -96 dBm |
| 2 | AT&T | 77.9 | 99.2% | 99.1% | 65.4% | 45.9% | -111 dBm |
| 3 | T-Mobile | 76.2 | 78.7% | 78.2% | 71.7% | 50.0% | -91 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Clinton County, MI
Verizon
- Overall
- 99.8%
- 4G LTE
- 99.8%
- 5G
- 90.3%
- Fast 5G
- 76.2%
AT&T
- Overall
- 99.2%
- 4G LTE
- 99.1%
- 5G
- 65.4%
- Fast 5G
- 45.9%
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 78.7%
- 4G LTE
- 78.2%
- 5G
- 71.7%
- Fast 5G
- 50.0%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Clinton County, MI
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bath, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 51.1% 48.2% -96 dBm | 98.6% 98.6% 87.1% 75.5% -112 dBm | 97.8% 97.8% 82.7% 51.8% -94 dBm |
| Dewitt, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 79.4% 51.5% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 88.2% -88 dBm |
| Eagle, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -70 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -60 dBm |
| Elsie, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.2% -93 dBm | 69.2% 69.2% 0.0% 0.0% -119 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Eureka, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91.7% -98 dBm | 95.8% 95.8% 29.2% 12.5% -118 dBm | 41.7% 41.7% 33.3% 4.2% -100 dBm |
| Fowler, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.6% -100 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -72 dBm |
| Lake Victoria, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 10.0% 5.0% -100 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 5.0% 0.0% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% 25.0% -100 dBm |
| Maple Rapids, MI | 90.9% 90.9% 15.2% 0.0% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.9% -107 dBm | 6.1% 6.1% 0.0% 0.0% -105 dBm |
| Ovid, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -70 dBm |
| Saint Johns, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 90.2% 75.0% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 74.1% 54.7% -112 dBm | 87.2% 86.5% 82.6% 60.9% -90 dBm |
| St. Johns, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.0% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 97.0% 94.0% -106 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm |
| Wacousta, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.9% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 83.5% 49.1% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 96.2% 80.7% -85 dBm |
| Westphalia, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% 76.0% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 96.0% 44.0% -114 dBm | 12.0% 12.0% 8.0% 4.0% -103 dBm |
| East Lansing, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 99.4% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 76.6% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 92.8% -84 dBm |
| Grand Ledge, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.9% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 96.7% 80.4% -105 dBm | 97.8% 97.8% 97.8% 96.7% -82 dBm |
| Haslett, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 83.0% -97 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 67.0% 43.7% -109 dBm | 98.9% 98.1% 90.4% 62.9% -90 dBm |
| Hubbardston, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% 94.3% -79 dBm | 57.1% 57.1% 14.3% 2.9% -120 dBm | 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Laingsburg, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 97.3% 97.3% -78 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 2.7% 0.0% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.3% -75 dBm |
| Lansing, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% 97.5% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.6% 71.4% -102 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 98.7% 95.3% -80 dBm |
| Pewamo, MI | 100.0% 100.0% 78.3% 17.4% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -108 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -77 dBm |