Cell phone coverage map for Martin County, FL
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © OpenMapTiles. Basemap by OpenFreeMap. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by CompareWirelessCarriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage rankings by network in Martin County, FL
Verizon
- Overall
- 100.0%
- 4G LTE
- 100.0% avg. -87 dBm 4G LTE signal where 4G LTE coverage exists: avg. -87 dBm
- 5G
- 94.1% avg. -94 dBm 5G signal where 5G coverage exists: avg. -94 dBm
- Fast 5G
- 77.6% avg. -93 dBm Fast 5G signal where Fast 5G coverage exists: avg. -93 dBm
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 88.0%
- 4G LTE
- 87.7% avg. -93 dBm 4G LTE signal where 4G LTE coverage exists: avg. -93 dBm
- 5G
- 84.6% avg. -88 dBm 5G signal where 5G coverage exists: avg. -88 dBm
- Fast 5G
- 67.4% avg. -85 dBm Fast 5G signal where Fast 5G coverage exists: avg. -85 dBm
AT&T
- Overall
- 97.9%
- 4G LTE
- 96.9% avg. -103 dBm 4G LTE signal where 4G LTE coverage exists: avg. -103 dBm
- 5G
- 90.2% avg. -106 dBm 5G signal where 5G coverage exists: avg. -106 dBm
- Fast 5G
- 40.7% avg. -102 dBm Fast 5G signal where Fast 5G coverage exists: avg. -102 dBm
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Martin County, FL
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hobe Sound, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% | 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 50.3% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% |
| Indiantown, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 80.3% | 100.0% 99.2% 99.5% 71.0% | 94.9% 94.4% 94.2% 80.8% |
| Jensen Beach, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 44.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.9% |
| Jupiter Island, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 96.0% 80.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 98.7% 46.7% | 98.7% 98.7% 97.3% 82.7% |
| North River Shores, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 63.9% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% |
| Ocean Breeze, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% |
| Palm City, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.2% | 98.9% 97.8% 95.7% 38.3% | 99.7% 99.7% 98.6% 79.3% |
| Port Salerno, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.5% | 100.0% 100.0% 97.9% 45.8% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.7% |
| Rio, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% |
| Sewall’s Point, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% 36.7% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% |
| Stuart, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% | 99.5% 99.0% 97.9% 56.8% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% |
| Hutchinson Island South, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 91.6% 76.5% | 100.0% 100.0% 91.6% 47.9% | 71.4% 71.4% 62.2% 45.4% |
| Jupiter, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 94.5% | 99.5% 99.5% 98.8% 68.2% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.9% |
| Jupiter Farms, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 89.4% 58.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.8% | 99.5% 99.5% 98.3% 85.1% |
| Port St. Lucie, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 98.0% | 99.9% 98.3% 97.5% 38.0% | 96.8% 96.7% 96.6% 93.6% |
| Tequesta, FL | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 48.0% | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 86.0% |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2026. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Martin County, FL where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.