Los Angeles County, CA Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Los Angeles County, CA

Coverage rankings for Los Angeles County, CA

T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 80.3. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1T-Mobile80.378.2%77.9%72.9%64.9% -85 dBm
2Verizon77.680.6%80.1%66.6%56.9% -92 dBm
3AT&T72.477.5%77.5%66.1%61.0% -109 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Los Angeles County, CA

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Los Angeles County, CA

#1

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 80.3
In Los Angeles County, CA
Overall
78.2%
4G LTE
77.9%
5G
72.9%
Fast 5G
64.9%
Average Signal -85 dBm
#2

Verizon

Coverage Score 77.6
In Los Angeles County, CA
Overall
80.6%
4G LTE
80.1%
5G
66.6%
Fast 5G
56.9%
Average Signal -92 dBm
#3

AT&T

Coverage Score 72.4
In Los Angeles County, CA
Overall
77.5%
4G LTE
77.5%
5G
66.1%
Fast 5G
61.0%
Average Signal -109 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Los Angeles County, CA

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Acton, CA 97.6% 97.5% 86.0% 72.9% -95 dBm 91.9% 91.9% 80.6% 79.6% -106 dBm 99.5% 99.5% 97.2% 92.0% -81 dBm
Agoura Hills, CA 100.0% 100.0% 91.8% 82.9% -89 dBm 98.8% 98.8% 92.4% 90.6% -108 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.2% -82 dBm
Agua Dulce, CA 95.5% 95.1% 75.8% 58.3% -95 dBm 85.2% 85.2% 69.7% 68.5% -111 dBm 88.2% 87.8% 82.1% 64.6% -90 dBm
Alhambra, CA 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 97.7% -88 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
Alondra Park, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.5% -94 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.5% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -78 dBm
Altadena, CA 100.0% 100.0% 94.0% 79.3% -90 dBm 99.5% 99.5% 93.5% 81.0% -108 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.0% -85 dBm
Arcadia, CA 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 97.5% -84 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 91.2% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% -81 dBm
Artesia, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -78 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -81 dBm
Avalon, CA 72.7% 72.7% 45.5% 33.3% -96 dBm 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm 53.0% 53.0% 45.5% 33.3% -85 dBm
Avocado Heights, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.3% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -74 dBm
Azusa, CA 99.5% 99.0% 99.5% 97.5% -85 dBm 99.0% 99.0% 98.5% 83.8% -102 dBm 96.6% 96.6% 94.6% 90.7% -80 dBm
Baldwin Park, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.6% -97 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Bell, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.2% -103 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
Bell Gardens, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -98 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
Bellflower, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.8% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -74 dBm
Beverly Hills, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% -84 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 90.6% -101 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 94.5% -80 dBm
Bradbury, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 97.5% 25.0% -115 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% 77.5% -91 dBm
Burbank, CA 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 94.2% -89 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 91.0% 76.5% -103 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% -78 dBm
Calabasas, CA 98.0% 97.4% 65.9% 49.3% -81 dBm 98.7% 98.7% 92.4% 89.4% -107 dBm 98.0% 98.0% 96.0% 85.1% -85 dBm
Canoga Park, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -73 dBm
Canyon Country, CA 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 93.7% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 96.8% -105 dBm 98.9% 98.9% 97.9% 92.6% -84 dBm
Carson, CA 100.0% 100.0% 97.3% 97.0% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.3% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 99.0% -77 dBm
Castaic, CA 99.4% 99.4% 89.4% 69.6% -96 dBm 96.3% 96.3% 87.6% 78.3% -109 dBm 99.4% 99.4% 93.2% 77.6% -88 dBm
Cerritos, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% -104 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% -80 dBm
Charter Oak, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Chatsworth, CA 92.3% 91.4% 85.3% 68.2% -96 dBm 75.4% 75.4% 53.4% 42.5% -111 dBm 81.2% 81.2% 71.3% 57.9% -88 dBm
Citrus, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -81 dBm
Claremont, CA 100.0% 100.0% 96.6% 88.4% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 93.5% 85.7% -104 dBm 99.0% 99.0% 94.9% 83.3% -87 dBm
Commerce, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.6% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -77 dBm
Compton, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.2% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Covina, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.2% -97 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Cudahy, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.3% -86 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -71 dBm
Culver City, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.5% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% -78 dBm
Del Aire, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -94 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -78 dBm
Desert View Highlands, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -95 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -111 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm
Diamond Bar, CA 98.1% 98.1% 95.4% 85.5% -94 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 98.5% 94.4% -103 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 93.8% -82 dBm
Dodgertown, CA 73.5% 73.5% 0.0% 0.0% -98 dBm 50.3% 50.3% 38.4% 9.6% -118 dBm 57.1% 55.1% 51.0% 34.4% -91 dBm
Downey, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -87 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.3% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -78 dBm
Duarte, CA 100.0% 99.3% 98.7% 76.8% -92 dBm 83.4% 83.4% 63.6% 52.3% -110 dBm 86.1% 86.1% 81.5% 60.3% -87 dBm
East Los Angeles, CA 100.0% 100.0% 97.0% 97.0% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.2% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
East Pasadena, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
East Rancho Dominguez, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -78 dBm
East San Gabriel, CA 100.0% 100.0% 85.4% 85.4% -77 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.9% -80 dBm
East Whittier, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -108 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm
El Monte, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% -103 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
El Segundo, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.8% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% -78 dBm
Elizabeth Lake, CA 87.6% 85.4% 68.6% 46.7% -101 dBm 87.6% 87.6% 62.8% 61.3% -115 dBm 92.7% 92.7% 39.4% 27.7% -100 dBm
Encino, CA 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 96.6% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 95.8% 83.9% -106 dBm 98.3% 98.3% 94.1% 79.7% -85 dBm
Florence-Graham, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 86.8% -106 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -73 dBm
Gardena, CA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% -88 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% -100 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Los Angeles County, CA where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.