Gila County, AZ Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Gila County, AZ

Coverage rankings for Gila County, AZ

AT&T currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 31.1. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1AT&T31.145.1%45.1%8.5%8.2% -115 dBm
2T-Mobile31.025.7%21.7%22.7%12.3% -95 dBm
3Verizon29.839.0%38.9%5.8%2.9% -101 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Gila County, AZ

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Gila County, AZ

#1

AT&T

Coverage Score 31.1
In Gila County, AZ
Overall
45.1%
4G LTE
45.1%
5G
8.5%
Fast 5G
8.2%
Average Signal -115 dBm
#2

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 31.0
In Gila County, AZ
Overall
25.7%
4G LTE
21.7%
5G
22.7%
Fast 5G
12.3%
Average Signal -95 dBm
#3

Verizon

Coverage Score 29.8
In Gila County, AZ
Overall
39.0%
4G LTE
38.9%
5G
5.8%
Fast 5G
2.9%
Average Signal -101 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Gila County, AZ

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Bear Flat, AZ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Beaver Valley, AZ 61.3% 61.3% 6.5% 3.2% -106 dBm 48.4% 48.4% 3.2% 3.2% -117 dBm 83.9% 54.8% 83.9% 38.7% -95 dBm
Canyon Day, AZ 97.3% 97.3% 60.2% 7.1% -98 dBm 98.2% 98.2% 0.0% 0.0% -102 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Carrizo, AZ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22.6% 22.6% 0.0% 0.0% -114 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Cedar Creek, AZ 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 70.8% 70.8% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Central Heights-Midland City, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 95.1% 73.2% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 85.4% 78.0% -112 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.1% -76 dBm
Christopher Creek, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 77.9% 64.7% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 95.6% 86.8% -103 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% 94.1% -80 dBm
Claypool, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 68.0% 52.0% -94 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 84.0% 84.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -77 dBm
Copper Hill, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 8.9% 2.5% -90 dBm 99.4% 99.4% 62.0% 56.3% -110 dBm 94.9% 90.5% 86.7% 63.3% -88 dBm
Cutter, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -71 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 27.8% 27.8% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
Deer Creek, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm 97.4% 97.4% 64.1% 64.1% -111 dBm 100.0% 94.9% 100.0% 82.1% -87 dBm
Dripping Springs, AZ 97.9% 97.9% 0.0% 0.0% -102 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 67.6% 48.6% 64.1% 0.0% -100 dBm
East Globe, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 31.5% 0.0% -95 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 42.5% 37.0% -113 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.2% -91 dBm
East Verde Estates, AZ 49.1% 49.1% 1.9% 0.0% -106 dBm 64.2% 64.2% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm 81.1% 73.6% 75.5% 52.8% -94 dBm
El Capitan, AZ 99.2% 99.2% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm 10.8% 10.8% 0.0% 0.0% -119 dBm 96.9% 96.9% 96.9% 64.6% -93 dBm
Flowing Springs, AZ 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% -98 dBm 36.8% 36.8% 0.0% 0.0% -119 dBm 78.9% 44.7% 78.9% 31.6% -98 dBm
Freedom Acres, AZ 67.5% 67.5% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm 57.5% 57.5% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm 87.5% 65.0% 87.5% 57.5% -94 dBm
Geronimo Estates, AZ 20.7% 20.7% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 17.2% 17.2% 0.0% 0.0% -118 dBm 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 6.9% -90 dBm
Gisela, AZ 70.7% 70.7% 0.0% 0.0% -106 dBm 36.2% 36.2% 0.0% 0.0% -112 dBm 51.7% 41.4% 51.7% 0.0% -100 dBm
Globe, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 59.3% 18.7% -94 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 75.9% 68.4% -113 dBm 99.2% 96.6% 99.2% 80.6% -88 dBm
Haigler Creek, AZ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Hayden, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 25.9% 0.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 3.7% 3.7% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -72 dBm
Hunter Creek, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 80.9% 59.6% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 93.6% 93.6% -103 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm
Icehouse Canyon, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 58.7% 45.2% -95 dBm 98.1% 98.1% 66.3% 66.3% -112 dBm 99.0% 85.6% 98.1% 78.8% -90 dBm
Jakes Corner, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -79 dBm 63.3% 63.3% 3.3% 3.3% -116 dBm 93.3% 56.7% 93.3% 30.0% -99 dBm
Kohls Ranch, AZ 44.4% 44.4% 7.4% 0.0% -106 dBm 55.6% 55.6% 22.2% 18.5% -119 dBm 59.3% 51.9% 51.9% 25.9% -97 dBm
Mead Ranch, AZ 81.3% 81.3% 0.0% 0.0% -103 dBm 81.3% 81.3% 37.5% 37.5% -115 dBm 100.0% 81.3% 100.0% 56.3% -96 dBm
Mesa del Caballo, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 14.3% 0.0% -101 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 14.3% 14.3% -113 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
Miami, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 63.2% 52.6% -85 dBm 94.7% 94.7% 31.6% 31.6% -108 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -69 dBm
Oxbow Estates, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -104 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -88 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -63 dBm
Payson, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 89.3% 81.5% -85 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 87.3% 85.1% -110 dBm 100.0% 99.3% 100.0% 97.1% -81 dBm
Peridot, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 94.1% 89.9% -79 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm 12.6% 12.6% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm
Pinal, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 77.8% 22.2% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 88.9% 77.8% -116 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm
Pine, AZ 82.2% 82.2% 3.8% 0.6% -101 dBm 82.9% 82.9% 40.7% 38.1% -113 dBm 72.3% 66.7% 66.5% 44.9% -90 dBm
Rock House, AZ 42.9% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 42.9% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Roosevelt, AZ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 98.3% 98.3% 75.9% 75.9% -111 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Roosevelt Estates, AZ 94.3% 94.3% 69.5% 56.2% -89 dBm 94.3% 94.3% 79.0% 78.1% -104 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Round Valley, AZ 81.0% 81.0% 30.0% 17.0% -101 dBm 68.0% 68.0% 9.0% 9.0% -115 dBm 76.0% 68.0% 75.0% 53.0% -89 dBm
Rye, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -67 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -65 dBm
San Carlos, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 7.7% 4.9% -84 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 43.4% 43.4% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm
Six Shooter Canyon, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 44.4% 28.6% -97 dBm 95.2% 95.2% 71.4% 71.4% -112 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% -87 dBm
Star Valley, AZ 95.4% 95.4% 49.3% 29.1% -95 dBm 91.6% 91.6% 50.3% 49.9% -111 dBm 99.5% 96.3% 99.4% 96.4% -81 dBm
Strawberry, AZ 81.0% 81.0% 12.7% 6.0% -102 dBm 93.3% 93.3% 3.6% 3.2% -109 dBm 80.6% 69.4% 73.8% 54.0% -93 dBm
Tonto Basin, AZ 80.7% 80.7% 26.9% 0.7% -102 dBm 94.6% 94.6% 10.2% 10.2% -102 dBm 84.9% 71.3% 84.9% 71.6% -93 dBm
Tonto Village, AZ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm 87.5% 87.5% 25.0% 12.5% -120 dBm 100.0% 62.5% 100.0% 50.0% -98 dBm
Washington Park, AZ 3.8% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% -105 dBm 30.8% 30.8% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm
Wheatfields, AZ 99.4% 99.4% 26.9% 6.9% -98 dBm 89.1% 89.1% 66.3% 66.3% -119 dBm 96.0% 80.0% 96.0% 59.4% -93 dBm
Whispering Pines, AZ 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 22.2% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Young, AZ 72.4% 72.4% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm 67.9% 67.9% 0.0% 0.0% -109 dBm 2.7% 2.7% 1.3% 1.0% -102 dBm
Forest Lakes, AZ 95.5% 95.5% 16.1% 3.6% -96 dBm 64.6% 64.6% 1.8% 1.8% -113 dBm N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Gila County, AZ where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.