Coverage rankings for Coconino County, AZ
Verizon currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 37.0. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verizon | 37.0 | 54.8% | 54.7% | 6.4% | 3.6% | -102 dBm |
| 2 | AT&T | 36.7 | 60.2% | 60.2% | 7.0% | 5.0% | -114 dBm |
| 3 | T-Mobile | 35.7 | 33.3% | 32.3% | 24.9% | 14.5% | -96 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for Coconino County, AZ
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Coconino County, AZ
Verizon
- Overall
- 54.8%
- 4G LTE
- 54.7%
- 5G
- 6.4%
- Fast 5G
- 3.6%
AT&T
- Overall
- 60.2%
- 4G LTE
- 60.2%
- 5G
- 7.0%
- Fast 5G
- 5.0%
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 33.3%
- 4G LTE
- 32.3%
- 5G
- 24.9%
- Fast 5G
- 14.5%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Coconino County, AZ
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bellemont, AZ | 80.6% 79.6% 47.3% 32.3% -107 dBm | 98.9% 98.9% 22.6% 2.2% -106 dBm | 96.2% 95.2% 89.8% 67.2% -85 dBm |
| Bitter Springs, AZ | 96.2% 96.2% 0.0% 0.0% -91 dBm | 97.8% 97.8% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Blue Ridge, AZ | 92.4% 92.4% 0.0% 0.0% -99 dBm | 98.0% 98.0% 69.7% 63.1% -112 dBm | 5.6% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Cameron, AZ | 97.3% 97.3% 0.0% 0.0% -84 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -94 dBm | 98.8% 98.8% 48.4% 26.8% -88 dBm |
| Doney Park, AZ | 98.7% 98.5% 68.4% 45.8% -97 dBm | 97.8% 97.8% 19.2% 17.5% -107 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 94.9% -89 dBm |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 99.1% 99.1% 79.6% 63.4% -95 dBm | 98.1% 98.0% 74.6% 47.4% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.1% -84 dBm |
| Forest Lakes, AZ | 95.5% 95.5% 16.1% 3.6% -96 dBm | 64.6% 64.6% 1.8% 1.8% -113 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Fort Valley, AZ | 91.9% 91.9% 29.5% 19.0% -102 dBm | 93.2% 93.2% 57.4% 24.4% -111 dBm | 97.4% 89.0% 96.0% 77.3% -90 dBm |
| Fredonia, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -75 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 85.3% 85.3% -111 dBm | 99.5% 99.5% 97.4% 84.8% -91 dBm |
| Grand Canyon, AZ | 23.9% 23.8% 3.9% 2.6% -100 dBm | 34.3% 34.3% 1.3% 0.8% -113 dBm | 25.0% 23.0% 14.5% 7.8% -96 dBm |
| Grand Canyon Village, AZ | 63.3% 63.3% 33.6% 26.5% -100 dBm | 84.7% 84.7% 1.0% 1.0% -110 dBm | 71.8% 71.4% 56.3% 43.3% -93 dBm |
| Gray Mountain, AZ | 58.4% 58.4% 0.8% 0.3% -101 dBm | 78.3% 78.3% 0.0% 0.0% -113 dBm | 38.6% 38.0% 20.6% 8.1% -98 dBm |
| Greenehaven, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 94.1% 64.7% -90 dBm |
| Happy Jack, AZ | 60.7% 60.6% 3.1% 0.7% -105 dBm | 71.2% 71.2% 28.9% 26.3% -116 dBm | 46.0% 44.4% 33.3% 20.1% -97 dBm |
| Kachina Village, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 81.5% 74.1% -98 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 22.2% 22.2% -106 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.6% -80 dBm |
| Kaibab Estates West, AZ | 86.5% 86.5% 0.4% 0.0% -103 dBm | 84.2% 84.2% 0.0% 0.0% -115 dBm | 90.8% 90.6% 80.3% 35.7% -97 dBm |
| Kaibeto, AZ | 75.6% 75.6% 0.4% 0.3% -102 dBm | 57.0% 57.0% 1.4% 0.6% -114 dBm | 4.7% 4.7% 3.8% 1.4% -99 dBm |
| Kaibito, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -85 dBm | 99.4% 99.4% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| LeChee, AZ | 99.5% 99.2% 59.9% 40.7% -91 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -99 dBm | 91.8% 91.8% 85.4% 68.1% -88 dBm |
| Leupp, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -76 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -90 dBm | 95.3% 95.3% 71.5% 23.4% -101 dBm |
| Marble Canyon, AZ | 64.3% 64.3% 2.3% 1.7% -102 dBm | 61.7% 61.7% 8.2% 6.7% -114 dBm | 22.6% 22.4% 15.1% 5.5% -100 dBm |
| Moenkopi, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 62.5% 53.1% -87 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -87 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Mormon Lake, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.7% -101 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm |
| Mountain View Ranches, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% 39.0% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm |
| Mountainaire, AZ | 91.3% 86.3% 50.7% 24.7% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 32.0% 9.6% -114 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 84.0% 39.7% -95 dBm |
| Munds Park, AZ | 95.4% 94.6% 75.8% 61.4% -104 dBm | 77.9% 77.9% 0.0% 0.0% -109 dBm | 93.7% 84.8% 88.9% 60.1% -93 dBm |
| North Rim, AZ | 18.7% 18.6% 0.9% 0.0% -106 dBm | 14.0% 14.0% 0.2% 0.2% -119 dBm | 9.3% 5.7% 6.7% 2.9% -98 dBm |
| Oak Creek Canyon, AZ | 86.2% 85.0% 59.8% 34.5% -104 dBm | 77.5% 77.5% 5.9% 4.9% -111 dBm | 72.4% 69.0% 55.4% 34.1% -94 dBm |
| Page, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 56.6% 53.8% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -104 dBm | 98.7% 98.7% 90.4% 80.0% -84 dBm |
| Parks, AZ | 74.3% 74.2% 34.2% 22.1% -105 dBm | 78.6% 78.6% 23.3% 12.7% -115 dBm | 65.2% 63.2% 49.2% 19.3% -98 dBm |
| Red Lake, AZ | 87.4% 87.1% 17.5% 12.0% -101 dBm | 81.6% 81.6% 19.3% 7.8% -114 dBm | 96.1% 92.8% 94.4% 65.7% -91 dBm |
| Supai, AZ | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Timberline-Fernwood, AZ | 99.5% 99.5% 15.5% 0.0% -96 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 75.8% 74.9% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.1% -82 dBm |
| Tolani Lake, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -98 dBm | 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Tonalea, AZ | 96.8% 95.9% 90.0% 86.8% -81 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Tuba City, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 75.3% 70.5% -83 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -86 dBm | 2.1% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Tusayan, AZ | 92.3% 92.3% 2.5% 0.0% -92 dBm | 99.4% 99.4% 0.8% 0.0% -106 dBm | 89.0% 88.1% 74.3% 49.4% -92 dBm |
| Valle, AZ | 87.6% 87.6% 0.3% 0.0% -100 dBm | 91.4% 91.4% 39.9% 26.7% -116 dBm | 80.8% 80.5% 67.8% 49.1% -92 dBm |
| Williams, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 45.9% 36.9% -96 dBm | 99.3% 99.3% 33.7% 22.8% -109 dBm | 99.8% 98.0% 98.1% 92.8% -87 dBm |
| Pine, AZ | 82.2% 82.2% 3.8% 0.6% -101 dBm | 82.9% 82.9% 40.7% 38.1% -113 dBm | 72.3% 66.7% 66.5% 44.9% -90 dBm |
| Sedona, AZ | 99.7% 99.7% 98.2% 91.1% -93 dBm | 97.4% 97.4% 85.2% 75.8% -109 dBm | 98.5% 98.5% 96.4% 92.1% -81 dBm |
| Seligman, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -85 dBm | 99.3% 99.3% 0.0% 0.0% -104 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.3% -86 dBm |
| Strawberry, AZ | 81.0% 81.0% 12.7% 6.0% -102 dBm | 93.3% 93.3% 3.6% 3.2% -109 dBm | 80.6% 69.4% 73.8% 54.0% -93 dBm |
| Winslow, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 98.9% 96.8% -80 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 95.3% 78.1% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.3% -85 dBm |
| Winslow West, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 97.6% -87 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 84.5% 70.3% -111 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.6% -85 dBm |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Coconino County, AZ where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.