Alfalfa County, OK Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Alfalfa County, OK

Coverage rankings for Alfalfa County, OK

T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 89.6. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1T-Mobile89.693.7%92.8%89.8%71.3% -91 dBm
2Verizon77.1100.0%100.0%40.9%37.2% -91 dBm
3AT&T61.398.9%98.9%17.3%16.0% -108 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Alfalfa County, OK

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Alfalfa County, OK

#1

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 89.6
In Alfalfa County, OK
Overall
93.7%
4G LTE
92.8%
5G
89.8%
Fast 5G
71.3%
Average Signal -91 dBm
#2

Verizon

Coverage Score 77.1
In Alfalfa County, OK
Overall
100.0%
4G LTE
100.0%
5G
40.9%
Fast 5G
37.2%
Average Signal -91 dBm
#3

AT&T

Coverage Score 61.3
In Alfalfa County, OK
Overall
98.9%
4G LTE
98.9%
5G
17.3%
Fast 5G
16.0%
Average Signal -108 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Alfalfa County, OK

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Aline, OK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 14.3% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -80 dBm
Amorita, OK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 16.7% 16.7% -117 dBm 83.3% 83.3% 83.3% 0.0% -100 dBm
Burlington, OK 100.0% 100.0% 16.7% 16.7% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 83.3% 83.3% -118 dBm 83.3% 66.7% 83.3% 33.3% -96 dBm
Byron, OK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -74 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -112 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 40.0% -100 dBm
Carmen, OK 100.0% 100.0% 97.0% 84.8% -92 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -103 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.0% -88 dBm
Cherokee, OK 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -68 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.9% -83 dBm
Goltry, OK 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -90 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% 11.1% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% -94 dBm
Helena, OK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.5% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -106 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -66 dBm
Jet, OK 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -73 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -87 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -66 dBm
Lambert, OK 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm
Nescatunga, OK 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -96 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -106 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% -94 dBm

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Alfalfa County, OK where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.