Coverage rankings for Gila County, AZ
AT&T currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 31.1. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AT&T | 31.1 | 45.1% | 45.1% | 8.5% | 8.2% | -115 dBm |
| 2 | T-Mobile | 31.0 | 25.7% | 21.7% | 22.7% | 12.3% | -95 dBm |
| 3 | Verizon | 29.8 | 39.0% | 38.9% | 5.8% | 2.9% | -101 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for Gila County, AZ
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Gila County, AZ
AT&T
- Overall
- 45.1%
- 4G LTE
- 45.1%
- 5G
- 8.5%
- Fast 5G
- 8.2%
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 25.7%
- 4G LTE
- 21.7%
- 5G
- 22.7%
- Fast 5G
- 12.3%
Verizon
- Overall
- 39.0%
- 4G LTE
- 38.9%
- 5G
- 5.8%
- Fast 5G
- 2.9%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Gila County, AZ
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bear Flat, AZ | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Beaver Valley, AZ | 61.3% 61.3% 6.5% 3.2% -106 dBm | 48.4% 48.4% 3.2% 3.2% -117 dBm | 83.9% 54.8% 83.9% 38.7% -95 dBm |
| Canyon Day, AZ | 97.3% 97.3% 60.2% 7.1% -98 dBm | 98.2% 98.2% 0.0% 0.0% -102 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Carrizo, AZ | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 22.6% 22.6% 0.0% 0.0% -114 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Cedar Creek, AZ | 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 70.8% 70.8% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Central Heights-Midland City, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 95.1% 73.2% -92 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 85.4% 78.0% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.1% -76 dBm |
| Christopher Creek, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 77.9% 64.7% -91 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 95.6% 86.8% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.5% 94.1% -80 dBm |
| Claypool, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 68.0% 52.0% -94 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 84.0% 84.0% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -77 dBm |
| Copper Hill, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 8.9% 2.5% -90 dBm | 99.4% 99.4% 62.0% 56.3% -110 dBm | 94.9% 90.5% 86.7% 63.3% -88 dBm |
| Cutter, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -71 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 27.8% 27.8% -102 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm |
| Deer Creek, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm | 97.4% 97.4% 64.1% 64.1% -111 dBm | 100.0% 94.9% 100.0% 82.1% -87 dBm |
| Dripping Springs, AZ | 97.9% 97.9% 0.0% 0.0% -102 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 67.6% 48.6% 64.1% 0.0% -100 dBm |
| East Globe, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 31.5% 0.0% -95 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 42.5% 37.0% -113 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.2% -91 dBm |
| East Verde Estates, AZ | 49.1% 49.1% 1.9% 0.0% -106 dBm | 64.2% 64.2% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | 81.1% 73.6% 75.5% 52.8% -94 dBm |
| El Capitan, AZ | 99.2% 99.2% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm | 10.8% 10.8% 0.0% 0.0% -119 dBm | 96.9% 96.9% 96.9% 64.6% -93 dBm |
| Flowing Springs, AZ | 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% -98 dBm | 36.8% 36.8% 0.0% 0.0% -119 dBm | 78.9% 44.7% 78.9% 31.6% -98 dBm |
| Freedom Acres, AZ | 67.5% 67.5% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm | 57.5% 57.5% 0.0% 0.0% -117 dBm | 87.5% 65.0% 87.5% 57.5% -94 dBm |
| Geronimo Estates, AZ | 20.7% 20.7% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 17.2% 17.2% 0.0% 0.0% -118 dBm | 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 6.9% -90 dBm |
| Gisela, AZ | 70.7% 70.7% 0.0% 0.0% -106 dBm | 36.2% 36.2% 0.0% 0.0% -112 dBm | 51.7% 41.4% 51.7% 0.0% -100 dBm |
| Globe, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 59.3% 18.7% -94 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 75.9% 68.4% -113 dBm | 99.2% 96.6% 99.2% 80.6% -88 dBm |
| Haigler Creek, AZ | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Hayden, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 25.9% 0.0% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 3.7% 3.7% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -72 dBm |
| Hunter Creek, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 80.9% 59.6% -91 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 93.6% 93.6% -103 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm |
| Icehouse Canyon, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 58.7% 45.2% -95 dBm | 98.1% 98.1% 66.3% 66.3% -112 dBm | 99.0% 85.6% 98.1% 78.8% -90 dBm |
| Jakes Corner, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -79 dBm | 63.3% 63.3% 3.3% 3.3% -116 dBm | 93.3% 56.7% 93.3% 30.0% -99 dBm |
| Kohls Ranch, AZ | 44.4% 44.4% 7.4% 0.0% -106 dBm | 55.6% 55.6% 22.2% 18.5% -119 dBm | 59.3% 51.9% 51.9% 25.9% -97 dBm |
| Mead Ranch, AZ | 81.3% 81.3% 0.0% 0.0% -103 dBm | 81.3% 81.3% 37.5% 37.5% -115 dBm | 100.0% 81.3% 100.0% 56.3% -96 dBm |
| Mesa del Caballo, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 14.3% 0.0% -101 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 14.3% 14.3% -113 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm |
| Miami, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 63.2% 52.6% -85 dBm | 94.7% 94.7% 31.6% 31.6% -108 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -69 dBm |
| Oxbow Estates, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -104 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -88 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -63 dBm |
| Payson, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 89.3% 81.5% -85 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 87.3% 85.1% -110 dBm | 100.0% 99.3% 100.0% 97.1% -81 dBm |
| Peridot, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 94.1% 89.9% -79 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -93 dBm | 12.6% 12.6% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Pinal, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 77.8% 22.2% -99 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 88.9% 77.8% -116 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -86 dBm |
| Pine, AZ | 82.2% 82.2% 3.8% 0.6% -101 dBm | 82.9% 82.9% 40.7% 38.1% -113 dBm | 72.3% 66.7% 66.5% 44.9% -90 dBm |
| Rock House, AZ | 42.9% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 42.9% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Roosevelt, AZ | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 98.3% 98.3% 75.9% 75.9% -111 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Roosevelt Estates, AZ | 94.3% 94.3% 69.5% 56.2% -89 dBm | 94.3% 94.3% 79.0% 78.1% -104 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Round Valley, AZ | 81.0% 81.0% 30.0% 17.0% -101 dBm | 68.0% 68.0% 9.0% 9.0% -115 dBm | 76.0% 68.0% 75.0% 53.0% -89 dBm |
| Rye, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -67 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -91 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -65 dBm |
| San Carlos, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 7.7% 4.9% -84 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm | 43.4% 43.4% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Six Shooter Canyon, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 44.4% 28.6% -97 dBm | 95.2% 95.2% 71.4% 71.4% -112 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% -87 dBm |
| Star Valley, AZ | 95.4% 95.4% 49.3% 29.1% -95 dBm | 91.6% 91.6% 50.3% 49.9% -111 dBm | 99.5% 96.3% 99.4% 96.4% -81 dBm |
| Strawberry, AZ | 81.0% 81.0% 12.7% 6.0% -102 dBm | 93.3% 93.3% 3.6% 3.2% -109 dBm | 80.6% 69.4% 73.8% 54.0% -93 dBm |
| Tonto Basin, AZ | 80.7% 80.7% 26.9% 0.7% -102 dBm | 94.6% 94.6% 10.2% 10.2% -102 dBm | 84.9% 71.3% 84.9% 71.6% -93 dBm |
| Tonto Village, AZ | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -75 dBm | 87.5% 87.5% 25.0% 12.5% -120 dBm | 100.0% 62.5% 100.0% 50.0% -98 dBm |
| Washington Park, AZ | 3.8% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% -105 dBm | 30.8% 30.8% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm |
| Wheatfields, AZ | 99.4% 99.4% 26.9% 6.9% -98 dBm | 89.1% 89.1% 66.3% 66.3% -119 dBm | 96.0% 80.0% 96.0% 59.4% -93 dBm |
| Whispering Pines, AZ | 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | 22.2% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Young, AZ | 72.4% 72.4% 0.0% 0.0% -97 dBm | 67.9% 67.9% 0.0% 0.0% -109 dBm | 2.7% 2.7% 1.3% 1.0% -102 dBm |
| Forest Lakes, AZ | 95.5% 95.5% 16.1% 3.6% -96 dBm | 64.6% 64.6% 1.8% 1.8% -113 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Gila County, AZ where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.