Cumberland County, ME Cell Phone Coverage Map & Network Rankings (2026)

Find the best cell phone network and plan to use in Cumberland County, ME

Coverage rankings for Cumberland County, ME

T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 67.2. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.

RankCarrierScoreOverall4G LTE5GFast 5GAverage Signal
1T-Mobile67.270.6%70.6%59.7%39.9% -93 dBm
2AT&T66.994.3%94.3%45.4%28.1% -112 dBm
3Verizon59.494.6%94.5%14.5%8.1% -96 dBm

Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.

Cell phone coverage map for Cumberland County, ME

Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.

Coverage Key
Less covered More covered
Darker areas mean the carrier covers more of that location.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.

Loading coverage map...

Cell phone coverage by network in Cumberland County, ME

#1

T-Mobile

Coverage Score 67.2
In Cumberland County, ME
Overall
70.6%
4G LTE
70.6%
5G
59.7%
Fast 5G
39.9%
Average Signal -93 dBm
#2

AT&T

Coverage Score 66.9
In Cumberland County, ME
Overall
94.3%
4G LTE
94.3%
5G
45.4%
Fast 5G
28.1%
Average Signal -112 dBm
#3

Verizon

Coverage Score 59.4
In Cumberland County, ME
Overall
94.6%
4G LTE
94.5%
5G
14.5%
Fast 5G
8.1%
Average Signal -96 dBm
Sponsored US Mobile

Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.

US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.

Choose your network
Dark Star Light Speed Warp 5G
Unlimited plans from
$22.50/mo
Phone + home internet bundle from
$47/mo
Shop US Mobile

Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.

Coverage by city in Cumberland County, ME

Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.

CityVerizonAT&TT-Mobile
Bailey Island, ME 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% 44.0% -94 dBm 96.0% 96.0% 84.0% 72.0% -114 dBm 68.0% 68.0% 64.0% 40.0% -93 dBm
Bridgton, ME 100.0% 100.0% 2.4% 0.6% -99 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 37.1% 28.8% -114 dBm 68.2% 68.2% 50.6% 22.9% -98 dBm
Brunswick, ME 99.1% 99.1% 10.4% 5.6% -91 dBm 98.6% 98.6% 37.6% 14.6% -111 dBm 82.0% 82.0% 71.4% 52.7% -92 dBm
Cape Elizabeth, ME 100.0% 100.0% 6.1% 2.3% -93 dBm 98.3% 98.3% 87.8% 47.1% -109 dBm 93.3% 93.3% 86.6% 61.6% -91 dBm
Casco, ME 90.8% 90.8% 0.0% 0.0% -98 dBm 96.1% 96.1% 6.6% 3.9% -108 dBm 76.3% 76.3% 65.8% 48.7% -94 dBm
Chebeague Island, ME 75.6% 74.4% 15.9% 0.0% -104 dBm 69.5% 69.5% 25.6% 12.2% -117 dBm 30.5% 30.5% 23.2% 14.6% -96 dBm
Cliff Island, ME 89.5% 89.5% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm 57.9% 57.9% 10.5% 0.0% -117 dBm 52.6% 52.6% 42.1% 26.3% -94 dBm
Cousins Island, ME 87.5% 87.5% 25.0% 0.0% -101 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 37.5% 0.0% -112 dBm 54.2% 54.2% 33.3% 12.5% -97 dBm
Cumberland Center, ME 97.0% 97.0% 11.1% 2.0% -93 dBm 93.9% 93.9% 13.1% 7.1% -108 dBm 88.9% 88.9% 62.6% 15.2% -101 dBm
Cumberland Foreside, ME 92.6% 92.6% 7.4% 1.9% -101 dBm 98.1% 98.1% 31.5% 9.3% -110 dBm 83.3% 83.3% 74.1% 42.6% -96 dBm
Dunstan, ME 100.0% 100.0% 42.5% 27.4% -93 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 98.6% 61.6% -115 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.9% -88 dBm
East Baldwin, ME 84.3% 84.3% 13.6% 7.0% -101 dBm 96.5% 96.5% 42.0% 33.9% -115 dBm 35.4% 35.4% 22.9% 9.3% -100 dBm
Falmouth, ME 100.0% 100.0% 21.4% 7.1% -96 dBm 98.2% 98.2% 80.4% 26.8% -114 dBm 98.2% 98.2% 98.2% 91.1% -88 dBm
Falmouth Foreside, ME 97.2% 97.2% 36.1% 13.9% -97 dBm 94.4% 94.4% 80.6% 61.1% -110 dBm 91.7% 91.7% 83.3% 75.0% -89 dBm
Freeport, ME 100.0% 100.0% 86.8% 68.4% -87 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -107 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% -81 dBm
Gorham, ME 100.0% 100.0% 1.1% 0.6% -87 dBm 98.3% 98.3% 83.2% 55.3% -111 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 84.4% -86 dBm
Gray, ME 100.0% 100.0% 36.8% 20.6% -95 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 57.4% 47.1% -111 dBm 98.5% 98.5% 94.1% 61.8% -92 dBm
Harpswell, ME 99.4% 99.4% 19.2% 12.5% -90 dBm 94.3% 94.3% 34.0% 23.1% -109 dBm 76.5% 76.5% 62.8% 35.8% -95 dBm
Harrison, ME 68.5% 68.5% 11.5% 6.8% -101 dBm 83.2% 83.2% 36.1% 31.9% -116 dBm 32.8% 32.8% 24.3% 15.3% -96 dBm
Little Falls, ME 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -84 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 77.8% -108 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -84 dBm
Littlejohn Island, ME 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 0.0% -102 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 44.4% 0.0% -114 dBm 55.6% 55.6% 55.6% 55.6% -90 dBm
Long Island, ME 83.3% 83.3% 0.0% 0.0% -100 dBm 58.3% 58.3% 16.7% 0.0% -116 dBm 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 30.6% -92 dBm
Naples, ME 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -87 dBm 98.3% 98.3% 89.7% 82.8% -107 dBm 96.6% 96.6% 93.1% 77.6% -86 dBm
New Gloucester, ME 89.5% 89.3% 8.3% 3.5% -96 dBm 97.6% 97.6% 59.7% 41.7% -115 dBm 73.0% 73.0% 60.9% 39.1% -95 dBm
North Bridgton, ME 95.4% 95.4% 4.0% 1.4% -99 dBm 98.5% 98.5% 46.8% 39.4% -114 dBm 39.8% 39.8% 28.8% 13.6% -98 dBm
North Windham, ME 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -89 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 40.4% -109 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.3% -88 dBm
North Yarmouth, ME 89.9% 89.9% 3.0% 0.0% -103 dBm 94.7% 94.7% 54.7% 17.8% -115 dBm 79.2% 79.2% 63.4% 34.3% -96 dBm
Oak Hill, ME 100.0% 100.0% 60.3% 41.2% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 92.4% 51.1% -108 dBm 98.5% 98.5% 96.9% 79.4% -90 dBm
Orrs Island, ME 100.0% 100.0% 31.1% 26.7% -96 dBm 97.8% 97.8% 53.3% 42.2% -111 dBm 55.6% 55.6% 28.9% 8.9% -102 dBm
Peaks Island, ME 100.0% 100.0% 32.1% 7.1% -101 dBm 78.6% 78.6% 25.0% 0.0% -115 dBm 82.1% 82.1% 60.7% 25.0% -99 dBm
Portland, ME 99.6% 99.6% 60.6% 42.0% -92 dBm 95.2% 95.2% 78.6% 29.5% -106 dBm 95.8% 95.8% 92.9% 86.7% -80 dBm
Pownal, ME 71.6% 71.4% 4.9% 0.9% -105 dBm 80.1% 80.1% 28.0% 17.8% -114 dBm 43.6% 43.6% 31.8% 20.3% -96 dBm
Raymond, ME 89.7% 89.7% 3.2% 2.0% -98 dBm 94.0% 94.0% 25.8% 15.3% -114 dBm 56.3% 56.3% 40.7% 20.6% -99 dBm
Scarborough, ME 99.6% 99.6% 34.1% 22.4% -95 dBm 92.1% 92.0% 71.4% 33.1% -114 dBm 82.5% 82.5% 72.9% 50.1% -93 dBm
Sebago, ME 93.5% 93.3% 13.9% 7.1% -95 dBm 73.8% 73.8% 30.0% 21.9% -117 dBm 23.2% 23.0% 17.7% 8.5% -97 dBm
South Portland, ME 100.0% 100.0% 79.4% 60.1% -87 dBm 98.6% 98.2% 93.2% 35.9% -104 dBm 99.3% 99.3% 99.3% 98.6% -79 dBm
South Windham, ME 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% -82 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 86.2% 65.5% -106 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm
Standish, ME 93.4% 93.4% 36.1% 24.6% -95 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 6.6% 3.3% -102 dBm 88.5% 88.5% 82.0% 68.9% -89 dBm
Steep Falls, ME 96.7% 96.7% 0.0% 0.0% -101 dBm 99.6% 99.6% 0.0% 0.0% -111 dBm 48.3% 48.3% 31.4% 10.3% -102 dBm
West Baldwin, ME 90.4% 90.2% 13.0% 7.2% -98 dBm 90.4% 90.4% 56.6% 46.8% -117 dBm 55.1% 55.1% 40.6% 21.1% -98 dBm
Westbrook, ME 99.5% 99.5% 45.7% 27.8% -93 dBm 95.4% 95.4% 72.4% 29.1% -110 dBm 99.7% 99.7% 99.5% 93.6% -85 dBm
Windham, ME 97.9% 97.9% 1.4% 0.4% -94 dBm 99.1% 99.1% 56.3% 35.0% -112 dBm 94.2% 94.2% 85.8% 63.1% -91 dBm
Yarmouth, ME 100.0% 100.0% 36.8% 17.6% -94 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 64.0% 53.6% -110 dBm 92.0% 92.0% 75.2% 44.8% -94 dBm
Auburn, ME 97.2% 97.2% 20.3% 11.2% -94 dBm 98.0% 98.0% 46.1% 31.2% -112 dBm 86.5% 86.5% 76.9% 53.9% -92 dBm
Bath, ME 96.3% 96.3% 25.6% 15.3% -93 dBm 98.6% 98.6% 67.9% 30.7% -115 dBm 83.3% 83.3% 67.9% 45.1% -95 dBm
Old Orchard Beach, ME 100.0% 100.0% 23.6% 10.3% -91 dBm 100.0% 100.0% 98.3% 71.8% -110 dBm 98.9% 98.9% 97.7% 83.3% -89 dBm
Saco, ME 99.8% 99.8% 18.4% 11.0% -96 dBm 94.6% 94.6% 75.2% 43.5% -113 dBm 85.6% 85.6% 77.7% 58.8% -90 dBm

About The Coverage Data

Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Cumberland County, ME where that carrier has coverage.

If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.