Coverage rankings for Butte County, CA
T-Mobile currently ranks first for coverage in this area, with a coverage score of 66.4. Compare Wireless Carriers uses FCC broadband map data to estimate and calculate coverage scores. More on that further below.
| Rank | Carrier | Score | Overall | 4G LTE | 5G | Fast 5G | Average Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T-Mobile | 66.4 | 64.9% | 64.9% | 58.6% | 44.5% | -91 dBm |
| 2 | Verizon | 66.4 | 73.6% | 73.4% | 54.2% | 38.8% | -98 dBm |
| 3 | AT&T | 51.5 | 65.0% | 60.8% | 52.2% | 20.1% | -113 dBm |
Scores include coverage area, network type, and average signal strength.
Cell phone coverage map for Butte County, CA
Zoom in for local detail. Tap or click a colored area to see coverage and signal details. On mobile, use two fingers to move the map.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, © CARTO. Rendered with MapLibre. FCC BDC mobile coverage processed by Compare Wireless Carriers.
Loading coverage map...
Cell phone coverage by network in Butte County, CA
T-Mobile
- Overall
- 64.9%
- 4G LTE
- 64.9%
- 5G
- 58.6%
- Fast 5G
- 44.5%
Verizon
- Overall
- 73.6%
- 4G LTE
- 73.4%
- 5G
- 54.2%
- Fast 5G
- 38.8%
AT&T
- Overall
- 65.0%
- 4G LTE
- 60.8%
- 5G
- 52.2%
- Fast 5G
- 20.1%
Coverage varies by neighborhood. Your carrier shouldn’t.
US Mobile lets you switch between all three major networks, so you can choose the one that works best where you actually use your phone.
Pricing, network access, switching terms, and home internet availability may vary.
Coverage by city in Butte County, CA
Cities and towns are shown for county-level comparison. Coverage percentages use land-area only coverage.
| City | Verizon | AT&T | T-Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bangor, CA | 84.6% 84.0% 44.0% 4.9% -105 dBm | 76.3% 76.3% 59.4% 17.5% -118 dBm | 42.2% 41.5% 25.8% 7.4% -100 dBm |
| Berry Creek, CA | 87.5% 86.6% 25.3% 13.5% -103 dBm | 74.1% 73.3% 50.8% 19.2% -115 dBm | 40.7% 40.6% 30.3% 18.4% -96 dBm |
| Biggs, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -105 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -82 dBm |
| Butte Creek Canyon, CA | 85.3% 85.1% 52.8% 29.9% -99 dBm | 92.4% 87.8% 81.7% 41.6% -112 dBm | 99.6% 99.6% 96.8% 82.9% -86 dBm |
| Butte Meadows, CA | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 0.0% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Butte Valley, CA | 99.1% 98.9% 90.3% 77.4% -92 dBm | 89.8% 89.2% 75.6% 34.8% -113 dBm | 99.3% 99.3% 96.4% 90.1% -80 dBm |
| Cherokee, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 58.5% 43.9% -93 dBm | 92.7% 90.2% 78.0% 22.0% -117 dBm | 73.2% 73.2% 68.3% 39.0% -92 dBm |
| Chico, CA | 98.1% 98.0% 93.7% 82.3% -89 dBm | 94.6% 93.9% 91.4% 62.5% -106 dBm | 97.6% 97.6% 90.1% 76.8% -87 dBm |
| Clipper Mills, CA | 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% -110 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Cohasset, CA | 63.3% 63.1% 7.3% 2.0% -106 dBm | 42.6% 39.2% 25.0% 0.2% -119 dBm | 59.2% 59.2% 43.0% 23.8% -97 dBm |
| Concow, CA | 78.9% 78.6% 50.2% 26.6% -101 dBm | 88.8% 88.0% 75.2% 39.4% -112 dBm | 69.3% 69.3% 57.1% 39.7% -92 dBm |
| Durham, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 93.5% -90 dBm | 88.3% 77.2% 79.7% 22.7% -109 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 91.1% -87 dBm |
| Forbestown, CA | 47.7% 46.4% 8.6% 0.0% -107 dBm | 23.8% 23.8% 6.6% 0.7% -120 dBm | 5.3% 5.3% 2.0% 0.0% -104 dBm |
| Forest Ranch, CA | 47.3% 47.3% 14.4% 7.2% -105 dBm | 24.3% 21.3% 14.1% 1.2% -119 dBm | 43.4% 43.4% 26.6% 12.3% -99 dBm |
| Gridley, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -83 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -90 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -68 dBm |
| Honcut, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -95 dBm | 96.9% 91.8% 93.9% 0.0% -119 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 43.9% -99 dBm |
| Kelly Ridge, CA | 97.9% 97.9% 89.4% 78.7% -85 dBm | 61.7% 61.7% 19.1% 0.0% -119 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 74.5% 61.7% -93 dBm |
| Magalia, CA | 78.2% 77.4% 52.1% 22.9% -101 dBm | 95.0% 94.1% 79.4% 36.5% -112 dBm | 89.4% 89.4% 83.5% 59.4% -90 dBm |
| Nord, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% 72.5% -101 dBm | 94.1% 82.4% 74.5% 0.0% -116 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.8% -95 dBm |
| Oroville, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 97.6% -86 dBm | 99.7% 99.4% 97.3% 69.2% -106 dBm | 99.7% 99.7% 97.6% 88.6% -85 dBm |
| Oroville East, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 95.8% 79.2% -94 dBm | 83.4% 82.4% 67.7% 35.7% -113 dBm | 91.6% 91.6% 48.5% 24.8% -97 dBm |
| Palermo, CA | 98.1% 98.1% 93.2% 79.7% -93 dBm | 92.0% 89.2% 83.6% 38.4% -113 dBm | 88.7% 88.7% 67.6% 45.6% -94 dBm |
| Paradise, CA | 98.9% 98.9% 70.2% 51.9% -94 dBm | 99.5% 99.5% 95.9% 36.0% -104 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% -75 dBm |
| Rackerby, CA | 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% -108 dBm | 14.3% 14.3% 7.1% 0.0% -120 dBm | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A |
| Richvale, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% 35.0% -99 dBm | 45.0% 15.0% 35.0% 0.0% -120 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 65.0% -94 dBm |
| Robinson Mill, CA | 97.1% 97.1% 14.3% 0.0% -105 dBm | 65.7% 65.7% 28.6% 14.3% -117 dBm | 14.3% 11.4% 2.9% 0.0% -98 dBm |
| South Oroville, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -76 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.2% -97 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 95.2% -82 dBm |
| Stirling City, CA | 58.6% 58.6% 17.2% 0.0% -110 dBm | 58.6% 58.6% 34.5% 24.1% -116 dBm | 27.6% 27.6% 13.8% 0.0% -99 dBm |
| Thermalito, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.8% -95 dBm | 89.5% 87.3% 82.4% 42.8% -110 dBm | 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% 70.6% -92 dBm |
| Yankee Hill, CA | 100.0% 100.0% 55.8% 39.5% -97 dBm | 93.9% 93.9% 72.8% 43.5% -116 dBm | 49.0% 49.0% 36.7% 21.1% -93 dBm |
| Loma Rica, CA | 82.3% 80.9% 59.3% 32.2% -96 dBm | 86.9% 86.7% 76.1% 49.9% -109 dBm | 46.2% 45.7% 26.4% 3.7% -102 dBm |
About The Coverage Data
Coverage and signal estimates are derived by Compare Wireless Carriers from carrier-reported data in the FCC’s National Broadband Coverage Map, last updated in June 2025. “Percent covered” shows how much of the city or ZIP code area has a carrier signal, whether weak or strong. Signal bars show the estimated average signal strength in areas of Butte County, CA where that carrier has coverage.
If a carrier says you should have service but you do not, run a challenge test with the FCC Mobile Speed Test App. The FCC uses those results to check carrier-submitted coverage data and requires a carrier response when enough tests show a pattern of inaccurate coverage reporting.